-/\/\-----------------------------------------------------------------
\ / HEARTLIGHT(R) Magazine -- http://www.heartlight.org/
--\/------------------------------------------------------------------
December 27, 2008
|-- Today's Verse Now on Facebook -------------------------|
Now you can add Today's Verse to your Facebook account &
share a daily verse from God's Word with your friends.
Just add the application to your Facebook profile and the
verse will update automatically. Click below for details:
|-- http://ads.heartlight.org/email/159/ ------------------|
=========================== TODAY'S ARTICLE ==========================
Room at the Manger, by Patrick D. Odum
Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his
star in the east and have come to worship him (Matthew 2:2 TNIV).
So in case you were wondering, an astrophysicist at Notre Dame
University is pretty sure he can tell you what the star really was that
the gospel of Matthew says announced Jesus' birth to the Magi.
After years of consulting NASA databases to look for supernovas, novas,
comets, planetary alignments, and other astronomical events that seem
to have occurred between 8 and 4 BC, Grant Matthews is pretty sure that
he knows what the "star" was. It wasn't actually a star at all, he
says, but an alignment of the Sun, Jupiter, Saturn, and the Moon in the
constellation Aries.
If you accept the assumption that the wise men were Zoroastrian
astrologers from what is now Iran, Matthews says, then they would have
believed that the alignment of the planets in Aries was a sign that a
powerful leader had been born. "In fact it would have even meant that
he was destined to die at an appointed time," Matthews explains, "which
.. may have been why they brought myrrh, which was an embalming
fluid."
Matthews can even tell you the date of the event: April 17th, 6 BC.
What, you were really expecting December 25th?
Based on my extensive knowledge of astrophysics -- I can spell the word
without using my spell checker -- Grant Matthews' observations sound
pretty valid. He's done his research, that much is certain. I like that
he seems to be operating from a perspective of faith and taking the
Gospel accounts seriously as history. And I like the bit about the
Zoroastrian beliefs and how they connect to the story of Jesus. I have
to admit, I was interested to read about Matthews' work, but I came
away with a couple of questions.
The first is this: If Matthews had found no record of any astronomical
phenomena that had occurred within the correct time window, what would
have his conclusion been? That's the double edge of reading the Bible
with a scientific eye. Sure, it's cool when the science supports the
text, as it does in this case, but what do you do when it doesn't? Do
you dismiss the text, or do you recognize the limits of human
understanding?
And the other question I have is related to the first one, though maybe
even more relevant. As I said, I was interested in Matthews' research.
Still, after reading it the question came unbidden into my mind.
So what?
I'd just rather follow its lead!
Oh, don't get me wrong, I have no quarrel with Dr. Matthews. He's a man
of intellect and faith who, as far as I know, has more of either than I
ever will. So when I ask "So what?" I'm not disparaging his work. Maybe
it's just me, but when I read the Gospel of Matthew my first thought
isn't to wonder what that star really was. It's to wonder at the power
of God to set such a sign in the heavens in the first place. And it's
to wonder at the event that it signified, and at the love and grace in
the gift.
Maybe it's because I'm not a scientist, but I'm less interested in the
nature of the astronomical phenomena in the skies over Bethlehem that
night, and more interested in the person to whom the star pointed. Come
to think of it, though, the wise men don't seem to have been that
interested either in whether the "star" was a comet or a planetary
alignment or a supernova or actually a star that wasn't there the night
before. Matthew doesn't tell us that they holed up in a lab or
observatory to debate the nature of the event. "We saw his star when it
rose and have come to worship him." What that star was didn't seem to
matter to them nearly as much as their response to it.
The same, I think, is true for us. Again, I don't think there's
anything necessarily wrong about Dr. Matthews' work. It's interesting
and fun (for a theoretical astrophysicist, anyway) and ought to make a
good paper. Surely Dr. Matthews won't make the mistake of getting so
wrapped up in data about the precise nature of the event that he
forgets the meaning of it, or what his response to it should be. "We
saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him." Surely in this
age of computerized databases and scientific breakthrough there's still
room at the manger for people who know when to leave their scientific
instruments and come to worship.
We can't forget that we're talking about a story in which a virgin
gives birth to a child conceived by the Holy Spirit in order to deliver
people from the power of sin and death. We can't forget that the chief
player in all this is the God who created the stars. Is it so difficult
to believe that the God of creation who incarnated his very nature in a
baby carried by a young virgin couldn't have put anything he wanted --
comet, supernova, or star -- in an empty corner of space to direct
people of faith who wanted to come and worship in the place where it
was all happening? Listen to Matthew again:
After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star
they had seen when it rose went ahead of them until it stopped over
the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they were
overjoyed. On coming to the house, they saw the child with his
mother Mary, and they bowed down and worshiped him. Then they
opened their treasures and presented him with gifts of gold,
frankincense, and myrrh (Matthew 2:9-11).
In the end, at least for me, it comes down to this: Dr. Matthews'
research doesn't fill me with joy or make me want to worship and open
my treasures in tribute to Jesus. As interesting as it may be, it seems
to me to be ultimately very much beside the point. Even a distraction.
The wise men didn't come to explain the star, but to worship the Lord.
That should be our order of priorities as well, I think.
So no thanks. I don't think I want to explain the star that shone in
the sky over Bethlehem when Jesus was born. Instead I'd rather just
follow its lead and bow before the Lord who made the stars, lying in
his manger.
There are some things that don't need explanation.
---------
(c) 2008 Patrick D. Odum <p.d.odum@gmail.com>.
RELATED LINKS:
* Baby Worship
http://www.heartlight.org/articles/200412/20041219_babyworship.html
* Star of Wonder
http://www.heartlight.org/feature/feature_971224_star.html
* The Inflatable Christmas
http://www.heartlight.org/articles/200712/20071216_inflatable.html
* Faith Web
http://faithnet.faithsite.com
This article can be found on the web at:
http://www.heartlight.org/articles/200812/20081227_manger.html
=========================== FEATURED PRODUCT =========================
CINDERELLA - THE LOVE OF A DADDY AND HIS PRINCESS, by Steven Curtis Chapman
Steven Curtis Chapman reminds dads to enjoy the everyday moments with
their daughters. They will soon be gone.
http://shopping.heartlight.org/cgi-shl/link?256
Find more great books, CDs and videos at the Heartlight store! With
each purchase you make, you're helping to support Heartlight's
ministry. Thanks SO MUCH for your help!
HEARTLIGHT DAILY EMAIL /\/\
===============================================================\ /===
http://www.heartlight.org/ \/
Visit HEARTLIGHT on the web for even more articles, plus music,
devotionals and more for your Christian walk!
ABOUT HEARTLIGHT:
Heartlight, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) religious non-profit organization.
Donations are welcome and tax-deductible! Find out how to help!
http://www.heartlight.org/support
EDITOR: Phil Ware, phil@heartlight.org
HOW DO I SUBSCRIBE?
It's FREE! To subscribe send a blank email to:
join-heartlight@maillists.heartlight.org
HOW DO I LEAVE?
To unsubscribe send a blank email to:
heartlight-unsub@maillists.heartlight.org
STILL HAVING TROUBLE?
If our automated unsubscribe system isn't working for you,
send an email to mailmaster@heartlight.org and let us know
what list you would like to leave. We'll take care of you.
======================================================================
